Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Comparative Costs of Antibacterial Usage in Sexually Transmitted Infections in a Nigerian Teaching Hospital

Ismail A Suleiman1 , Fola Tayo2

1Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Practice, Niger Delta University, Wilberforce Island, PMB 071, Yenagoa, Bayelsa State; 2Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Biopharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Lagos, College of Medicine Campus, PMB 12003, Lagos, Nigeria.

For correspondence:-  Ismail Suleiman   Email: suleimanismail@yahoo.com   Tel:+2348023433337

Received: 9 June 2010        Accepted: 11 October 2010        Published: 23 December 2010

Citation: Suleiman IA, Tayo F. Comparative Costs of Antibacterial Usage in Sexually Transmitted Infections in a Nigerian Teaching Hospital. Trop J Pharm Res 2010; 9(6):549-555 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v9i6.5

© 2010 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the cost of antibacterial usage to patients in a tertiary health facility in Nigeria.
Methods:  Drug utilization evaluation was carried out retrospectively among patients with sexually transmitted infections (STIs) over a one-year period between 2005 and 2006 in Lagos University Teaching Hospital (LUTH), Nigeria. Case notes numbering 230 and containing 317 prescriptions were sampled consecutively with the aid of diagnostic coding cards. Relevant data including case demographics, diagnosis, prescribed drugs, and dosages were extracted and the associated costs analysed. 
Results: A majority of the patients (82.3 %) were youths aged 21 - 40 years. Higher prevalence was observed among male patients (70.2 %). The proportion of drugs prescribed in generic and branded names were 82.1 and 17.9 %, respectively. Total number of antibacterial doses was 7284 at a total cost of NGN239,420.00 (US$1,841.69). Average antibacterial cost per patient was NGN1,040.96 (US$8.00).  Quinolones were the most widely prescribed class of antibacterial agents (31.1 % of cases) at a cost of NGN81,646.00 (US$628.05) representing 34.1% of  the total antibacterial cost to patients.    
Conclusion: This study indicates that antibacterial cost was high, relative to the purchasing power of the local populace, a large proportion of whom live below the poverty line (US$1.00 per day). Furthermore, a greater proportion of the antibacterial cost was due to a few agents, the use of which should be evidence-based and closely monitored.

Keywords: Antibacterial therapy, Cost, Antibacterial utilization, Infectious diseases

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.523 (2021)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 39 (2021)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates